loader image

3D Body Scanning Versus Body Fat Callipers: Which One Is Better?

by | Apr 18, 2023 | Blog, Resources

When it comes to measuring body composition, two popular methods are 3D body scanning and body fat callipers. While both methods are used to determine body fat percentage, they have some significant differences. In this blog post, we will discuss the differences between these two methods and help you determine which one is better.

Styku 3D Body Scans:

A Styku 3D body scan is a non-invasive and quick way to obtain body measurements. The Styku scanner captures over 600 measurements of your body, including your body fat percentage, lean muscle mass, and body measurements such as waist, hips, and chest. The scanning process takes only a few minutes, and the results are instantly available.

One of the main benefits of a Styku 3D body scan is that it provides a highly accurate and comprehensive analysis of your body composition. It uses advanced technology to create a 3D model of your body, which allows you to see a detailed view of your body shape and track changes over time. Additionally, the scan is quick and does not require any contact with the body, making it more comfortable for individuals who may feel uncomfortable with other methods of body composition analysis.

Body Fat Callipers:

Body fat callipers, also known as skinfold callipers, are a more traditional method of measuring body fat percentage. They work by measuring the thickness of skinfolds in specific areas of the body, such as the triceps, biceps, and subscapular regions. The measurements are then used to calculate body fat percentage using a formula.

One of the main benefits of body fat callipers is that they are a relatively inexpensive method of measuring body fat percentage. They are also portable and can be used anywhere, making them a popular option for fitness professionals who need to take measurements on the go.

However, there are some drawbacks to using body fat callipers. First, they require a high level of skill and expertise to use correctly. Improper technique can lead to inaccurate results, which can be frustrating for individuals who are trying to track their progress. Additionally, skinfold thickness can vary depending on factors such as hydration and time of day, which can affect the accuracy of the results.

Which is better?

While both methods can be used to measure body fat percentage, the Styku 3D body scan is generally considered to be a more accurate and comprehensive method. The scan provides a detailed view of body shape and composition, and the results are less likely to be affected by external factors such as hydration or time of day.

However, the best method for you may depend on your personal preferences and goals. If you are looking for a quick and non-invasive way to measure body composition, a Styku 3D body scan may be the best option for you. If you prefer a more traditional method or have limited access to technology, body fat callipers may be a better choice.

In conclusion, both Styku 3D body scans and body fat callipers have their pros and cons. Ultimately, the best method for you will depend on your personal preferences, budget, and goals.



Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!